I’ve not been doing a good job reviewing books that I’ve
read so I decided to chat up some with “mini-reviews” of several books that I’ve
enjoyed this summer. I still need to
finish up with at least one more post on my nine days in NYC and hopefully
write about a few more things going on in my life other than drowning in sweat
after having finished mowing the lawn.
Anyway, here are mini reviews of a few of the books I’ve been reading
this summer:
Pat Conroy, South of
Broad (2009). I listened to this
book on Audible, which is a task as it is quite long and there were sections
that I went back and listened to a second time.
It is the story of Leo King and his friends, who were all thrown
together during desegregation in Charleston in the late 1960s. When we meet Leo, we realize he is a fragile
high school student who will be a senior.
His older brother has committed suicide, which has haunted Leo (and we
don’t learn of the reason until late in the book). The first part of the book tells about the
meeting up of this group of friends that include people from the Charleston
gentry to African-Americans, to orphans and poor-abused whites (Sheba becomes a
movie star and Trevor a musician and both are haunted by an estranged father
that keeps in the shadows). The second
part of the book is 20 years in the future, where the movie star comes back to
Charleston to seek the help of her friends to find her gay brother who has
disappeared. They all head to San
Francisco and find Shela’s brother who is dying of AIDS and bring him back to
Charleston. The book then jumps back to
1969 and high school football, before jumping back to the present in Charleston
with Sheba and Trevor’s crazy father and a city that endures the fury of
Hurricane Hugo. This book deals with a lot of sensitive
topics: child abuse, ecclesiastical abuse (by a priest), the struggle with race
and class in the American South, AIDS, and local issues like Hugo’s
destruction. Like all his writings,
Conroy gives us wonderful descriptions of South Carolina’s Low Country while
weaving wonderful stories.
Arthur Herman, How the
Scots Invented the Modern World (New York: Broadway Books, 2001), 474
pages. My daughter gave me this book for
Father’s Day… Although skeptical at
first, thinking that since it came out a few years after “How the Irish Save
Civilization,” those of us with Scottish blood and hubris would naturally think
we’d have a hand in creating civilization.
The book rose above hubris, showing how Scotland rose above the warlord
era of the Clans to become a modern nation and then (mainly through immigration
and education), shared such a vision with the rest of the world. A lot of this book goes into politics,
especially around the Jacobite rebellion in 1845, an attempt to place a Stuart
(Bonnie Prince Charles) back on the throne for Great Britain. The attempt failed. Unlike a lot of mythology that shows the era
of the clans (the chiefs were essentially warlords) to be glamorous, Herman dispels
this myth and also dispels the idea that all the Highland Clans supported the
Jacobite efforts (the MacKenzies, my main clan, were divided). Instead of this being a Scottish rebellion, Herman
suggests it was more of a civil war.
After 1745, Scotland began to value education and attempted to provide
public schools for all children. The Scottish
Universities begin to rival Cambridge and Oxford and at times were even
better. The Scottish Enlightenment and
its aftermath were felt throughout the Western world (David Humes, Thomas
Hobbes, Adam Smith, Thomas Reid, etc).
Although I would have liked to have seen more treatment of Scottish
Common Sense Philosophy, Herman does admit its influence into the Declaration
of Independence. Another area in which the Scots excelled was trade and
Scottish companies were the leaders in fostering trade throughout the British Empire
and around the globe. After discussing
the Scottish Enlightenment, the growth of Scottish Industry (for a century, Glasgow
led the world in tonnage of ships built) and trade, he discussed the role
various Scots played around the world.
He ends the book discussing the economic downturn in Scotland as
industries moved elsewhere and what its future might be. Herman also discusses the rise of Scottish
pride (thanks to the pens of folks like Sir. Walter Scott) and how the how “tartan”
thing became accepted and reinterpreted in Scotland and throughout the
world. Although the book was written
more than a decade before the Scottish failed vote for independence, Herman
makes the case that Scotland has long been tied to Great Britain and would
suffer if such ties were severed.
William Zissner, editor, Extraordinary
Lives; The Art and Craft of American Biography (New York: American
Heritage, 1985), 252 pages. Zissner,
best known for his book On Writing, has
been a favorite author on writing for me.
He died a few months ago. Upon
his death, I decided to see what I haven’t yet read of his and came across this
book which he edited. In the mid-80s, he
brought together six major biographers to lecture on their craft at the New
York City library. Zissner edited the
lectures and wrote the introductory chapter and published this book. What excites me about this book is that I
have read extensively the work of two of the biographers (David McCullough, and
Robert Caro). At the time of the
lecture, they both had done a major work and was working on others, but they
were still new at their craft. McCollough
had not yet published his major work on John Adams (he had published his work on Theodore Roosevelt and was working on his
biography of Harry Truman) and Caro had just published his first book on Lyndon
Johnson’s early life (he has since published three more and hasn’t yet gotten to
Johnson’s presidency). Other biographers included are Paul Nagel (The
Adam’s women), Richard Sewall (Emily Dickerson), Ronald Steel (Walter Lippmann),
and Jean Strouse (J. Pierpont Morgan and the family of Harry and Henry James). There is some good stuff in this old book,
especially if one is considering the task of writing a biography.
Quote: "In fact, the coexistence of these two biographies (Morris' and McCullough's biographies on T. Roosevelt) illustrate an important point, which is that there is not just one true story about any of these lives; there are instead versions of the past..." (Strouse, p. 166)
You're right--our reading tastes are night and day! Although much of my reading is to inspire me as I write children's books. I have the same problem you do with Audible and fiction. Nonfiction seems easier...I don't know why it is that I need the visual for fiction!
ReplyDeleteI've listened to both fiction and non-fiction on audible, but fiction is normally easier for me to follow (did I say otherwise?) Also, with non-fiction, I am often making notes and that's hard to do when listening and working out or driving.
DeleteSounds like a great trio of books. Not long after college, I read a fun book called The Mozart Myths. Along with debunking loads of long held assumptions about the great composer, it discussed all of the perils of biography writing in general. Fascinating stuff.
ReplyDeleteI have written some short biographical papers that focus on a section of an individual's life and find it exciting to research.
DeleteThe Pat Conroy book sounds really good. I love books about the Low Country, as well as anything with good characterization.
ReplyDeleteI like Conroy. What other "Low Country" books do you like?
DeleteI want the extraordinary lives. Didn't even know this was out there. Thanks for the heads up
ReplyDeleteLet me know if you can't find a copy... I don't remember if it was available new and I picked up a used book
DeleteI've reread South of Broad at least twice, and Beach Music and Prince of Tides, again by Conroy more than that. There is just something about the characters in his books that are both challenging and comfortable. I guess what I'm saying is that they are three dimensional in that you can see their flaws but like real people you can look beyond them.
ReplyDeleteI haven't read Beach Music, but read Prince of Tides twice. Good stuff, in my opinion.
DeleteI think it's great that we all read such different and diverse books. Glad you enjoyed what you read.
ReplyDeleteWhat do you read, Mary?
Delete'South of Broad' sounds in some ways similar to 'Prince of Tides', and perhaps both are somewhat autobiographical.
ReplyDeleteThe book on the lives of the Scots sounds good, I'll check it out this summer. Thanks for the reviews.
Well, he did go to the Citadel as did some of the characters in South of Broad... I think this might have been less autobiographical than "Prince of Tides" or "The Great Santini" The issues of integration and AIDS hit home for my generation
DeleteI read South of Broad last year. It was a slow intriguing read, and, to me, his genius is his ability to capture those characters and make them breathe.
ReplyDeleteHe does have a knack for creating characters!
DeleteI have a irrational dislike of Pat Conroy writing and Prince of Tides sent me over the edge. Sorry.
ReplyDeleteBut I really like your review of the second book How the Scots Invented the Modern World. I rather like the history of world books. This one sounds so interesting.
Terrific reviews.
cheers, parsnip
I know others who don't like Conroy,but when I read his description of the salt marsh in "Prince of Tides" I was hooked. I grew up in a similar environment in North Carolina
DeleteI had not read this bookI like books that put me on the edge.
ReplyDeleteThere were parts of "South of Broad" that was exciting and put you on edge (the encounters with the twin's estranged father and Hugo) but mostly the book was at a relaxed pace
DeleteSouth of Broad sounds extremely intense.
ReplyDeleteNot overly, check it out and see if you enjoy it (most Conroy readers either like or hate him)
DeleteI'm a fan of William Zissner. I was sad to hear of his passing.
ReplyDeleteYes, he gave so much to the writing community
DeleteWow, interesting heavy reads. I enjoy a good story on long drives especially if I'm the only one awake, thankfully, as the driver right!
ReplyDeleteI don't see these being too "heavy" (I read two more books this past month and one was a lot "heavier" but it was for work)
DeleteI love yor reviews.Always I love read about Scotland this sounds great for me:)
ReplyDeleteI love asparagus too lol
(About your comment in my blog)
Thanks... The asparagus comment comes from a life-long hatred of green beans, a food that was forced down me during my childhood...
DeleteAwww poor boy:)
DeleteAll we have some traumas food lol
x
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteA database from University Coll London showing the monies paid by the British Government when slavery was abolished. You might be amused which of the three Kingdoms had the most slave owners. And you'll be really shocked which sex too.
ReplyDeleteThis is interesting--I did a google search and read a couple of articles. It might have been a good thing that Britain lost the Revolutionary War... I wonder how much more it would have had to pay. It is also interesting the number of women who received compensation as slave owners. The sites I looked at: http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-02/27/slavery-database-goes-live http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/britains-colonial-shame-slaveowners-given-huge-payouts-after-abolition-8508358.html
DeleteI appended the database link to the earlier comment.
Deletehttps://www.ucl.ac.uk/lbs/ i don't know where it went. Lets have another swing at it.
I read Prince of Tides years ago by Conroy, but haven't read others by him. If I remember correctly, he loves going into details and back story.
ReplyDeleteThat would describe him--he does give a lot of detail about both his characters and the place in which the story is set and often goes off into other stories.
DeleteGood reviews. I'd be interested in reading How Scots Invented the Modern World myself. I recently read The Emperors New Kilt, an excellent book, I forget the author, full of forgotten stories from Scotland's history, well worth a read.
ReplyDeleteI don't read a lot of non-fiction, but I'd like to read the first book. I love Conroy's work. I haven't read him in years, though.
ReplyDelete