Earl Swift, Journey on
the James: Three Weeks through the Heart of Virginia (Charlottesville, VA:
University of Virginia Press, 2001), 239 pages, notes.
Earl Swift, a reporter for a Norfolk, Virginia newspaper and
Ian, a photographer for the same paper, set out in the fall of 1998 to explore
the length of the James River from its beginning in a spring bubbling up on a
farm deep in the Virginia Mountains until it empties out into the Chesapeake
Bay 430 miles later. At first, Swift
hikes along the stream bed. Once there
is enough water, he crawls into a canoe stuffed with extra flotation and with a
double-bladed paddle begins to make his way down river. At the end, when the river is wide and he’s
fighting the tide and wind, he switches to a sea kayak. As Swift sticks to the water, Ian follows
along in his old Volvo, scouting out places to stop, buying up all the Gatorade
he can find and supposedly taking a few photographs. In telling his story on the water, Swift
also explores the history of the region.
I must admit I had high hopes for this book and almost
decided not to finish reading it. Supposedly,
according to the back cover, the author had hiked the entire length of the
Appalachian Trail and paddled a kayak around the Chesapeake Bay. I was
expecting someone more turned into nature and the rhythm of the journey. I never came to care much for the author or
his side-kick. At times, it seemed Earl
was making light of their tenderfoot ways, but he never quite pulls it off in
the way Bill Bryson does in A Walk in the
Woods. Of course, part of this may
be that Swift was originally writing for a newspaper. Bryson’s humor involves stretching the truth
(or in some cases throwing it out the window), a talent that newspaper editors
may not appreciated. The lighthearted
comments on their ineptness fell flat. He’s
not Don Quixote and Ian isn’t the faithful squire Sancho. Also playing into my dislike of the
characters is the lack of awe that Swift shows as he makes his way across the
state. Part of this may be due to the
fact that he is never far from civilization and just about every bend in the
river, Ian is there to hand him a Gatorade and a peanut butter and jelly
sandwich. At the end of the day, when
they don’t want Mac and Cheese, Ian runs out for fast food and some beers. This is no wilderness trip.
However, I do appreciate Swift’s insight into the history of
this region. From the first English
settlement in the New World, through the battles between Native Americans and
Settlers, to the Revolutionary, Civil and the World Wars, the James has a story
to tell. With a journalistic eye, Swift
does a commendable job with the history.
He reminds his readers of the fights between civilizations (and makes
the point that the native population in this part of the New World had develop
quite an empire). In a way, the story of
the battle between the natives and immigrants is told backwards as he starts in
the west where the last battles occurred late in the 18th century
and then travels east where the first battles occurred early in the 17th
Century. I also gained appreciation for
the hard work and ingenuity of early Americans (and their slaves) as they
struggled to build a canal that ran up the river and help develop the western
part of the state. However, as soon as
the canals were complete, the railroad came onto the scene, making the canals
obsolete and eventually using their aqueducts to lay rails over creeks. Swift also covers the Civil War battles as he
paddles through Richmond and even mentions the role Newport News had in later
wars as it churned out and continues to churn out warships for the American
navy.
I don’t recommend this book for anyone interested in
canoeing as there are a number of other canoe trip books that I’ve reviewed
that I’d recommend first. However, if
you’re looking for a quick read on the history of Central Virginia, this book
has a lot to offer.