Archibald
Rutledge, God’s Children, 1947 (I read the Kindle edition of this
book).
I have a love
and hate relationship with this book. Archibald Rutledge had an
ability to see beauty and complexity everywhere. A lover of nature and
the beauty of his family’s South Carolina’s plantation, he was able to convey
the awe he experienced in nature into words that delight the reader. Yet,
as he was writing in the early 20th Century, there is a strong
sense of paternalism in how he relates to the African American sharecroppers
who worked the land. He claims to love them and credits them for helping
him experience the fullness of nature, yet he’s a man of his time. It
doesn’t seem to bother him that he lives in the big house and they live in
shacks.
However, Rutledge
saw himself responsible responsible for the welfare of those who live
around his plantation. “The whole business of government, especially the
unpleasant details of taxes, is to a plantation Negro a dark and mysterious
affair,” he writes. Then he tells the
story about Jim, an African American man who was delinquent on his poll tax and
about to lose his land. Rutledge spoke
to the Sheriff who said Jim had to pay the sum or he would have to claim
title. Rutledge paid it, and expected
Jim to work his debt off. But the Sheriff
later asked if Jim was over 60 years old, saying if so, he’d be exempt from the
poll tax. Talking with the Jim, Rutledge realized that he had no idea of
when he was born. He asked about things
he could remember in order to determine his age. He remembered being of “good sense” (which
would have meant around 6-7 years old) when there was the Great Shake (the
earthquake that damaged Charleston in 1886).
This put him over 60 years of age. Archibald received a
refund. Reading this, I was amazed Jim
would have to play a poll tax because I am sure he wasn’t able to vote South
Carolina at that time. Although it was noble of Rutledge to champion Jim’s
cause, he followed it up with a joke about how now plantation owners are the
slaves, as he noted how they are responsible for the descendants of slaves. I’m
sure if Rutledge was writing today and not in 1947, such views would not be
published or at least not received well by the general public.
Yet, there is
much wisdom and beauty in his writings.
“[L]ife is enlivened by its uncertainty, as it is made dearer by its
insecurity and its brevity. As the long
look of the setting sun lights up the fading landscape (especially an autumnal
one) with more tenderness than the morning mysterious glamours…” This portion of a sentence (Rutledge was no
Hemingway as I quoted only half the sentence) captures the wisdom and beauty of
his words. Life everywhere is made up of
roses and razor blades, arsenic and azaleas,” displays the paradox Rutledge saw
in life. Writing about the African
American cemetery, he says: “There the
mighty pines towered tallest; there the live oaks stood druidlike; there the
jasmines rioted freely over hollies and sweet myrtles, tossing their saffron showers
high in air. As children, Prince and I
dreaded this place.” His sentence structure is often complex and his words ring
of poetry.
In this book,
Rutledge tells of hunting and fishing with his African American friends around
the plantation. Some of the stories are
from his youth, such as when he and Prince caught a poisonous water moccasin
while fishing and used it to scare the plantation’s cook (I thought of my own experience of almost catching such a snake).
Some of the stories seem a bit fanciable such as Mobile, the huntsman,
hunting next to the rice paddies where workers were busy. His wife was working in the paddy and their
infant child was left to sleep on a dike.
When an eagle swooped down and grabbed the child, Mobile took aim and,
from a long distance, shot the bird and saved the child. Another story involved a traveling man with a
monkey. The monkey grabbed a child and
took it up on the roof of the house, requiring another heroic and comic rescue.
Rutledge shares
the plantation folk stories such as the one about the “Walk Off People.” When Adam and Eve were first created, all
wasn’t well in paradise. Adam liked to hunt and fish so much that Eve was bored
and threatened to leave him. So God
created more people so Eve would have company, but it was late in the day. God said he’d come back and put brains in
these newly created people, but some of them “walked off” and never got their
brains. This story not only explains
those without “good sense” but perhaps also those who move in on a married
woman that has played second fiddle to her husband’s interests.
Rutledge spends most of the fifth chapter
writing about the religion of his African American neighbors. The only place he gives insight into his own
beliefs is where he addresses the fundamentalists need to understand how “the
worship of nature and God go hand in hand, and that he who worships the God of
the universe is usually ready to accept Christ as the Son of that God.” Earlier in the book, he remarked how the folk
saying, “Prayers never gets grass out of de field” illustrated the truth about
faith without works!
I highly recommend this book, which
is available on Amazon Kindle for a minimal cost (I think I paid 99
cents). But I remember this book with a
warning. This was written sixty years ago and recalls stories that are over a
hundred years old. Today, paternalistic
views are criticized. Yet, the reader
who understands the world in which Rutledge was writing will appreciate his
attempt at honoring those who lived on the plantation as well as the magic of
the land. The author grew up on this plantation, then moved north for college
and to teach in Pennsylvania. In the
mid-1930s, he moved back to the plantation, to help restore it and lived there
until his death in 1973. He also served
for 40 years at the poet laureate of South Carolina and published over 50 books
and numerous articles, many about the outdoor life. Today, the plantation is a state historic
site.
“There is, I think, no lovelier land than the old plantation regions of the Carolinas—a land of hyacinth days and camellia nights. Nature there triumphs in giant trees, in great rivers, in lustrous fragrant fields, in an exotic profusion of wild flowers.”
-Archibald Hamilton Rutledge.
1883-1973
Everyone is a product of their time, so I don't think Rutledge is any different. Sounds like a good read.
ReplyDeleteI imagine this would be a challenging read - yet sounds as though it's because he really takes the reader back to the era (in mindset too). Eloquent quotes and a powerful cover. Thank you, Sage.
ReplyDeleteI'm not familiar with this book, but it sounds like a compelling read.
ReplyDeletewhat beautiful review. I would like to read this book. I have a kindle library and I ask books in amazon but still Im dont feel the same that e real book. Is my problem I know, I will try to find this.
ReplyDeleteI can understand how some might have conflicting emotions while reading this, but with time and place taken into consideration, it sounds delightful.
ReplyDeleteThis is surely rich in history, and reads like gentle poetry too, as well as hardships in some places I'm sure. I have been lucky to tour a few plantations, and I hope a whole lot more sometime too. I like looking at how things were and trying to put it all in perspective.
ReplyDeleteSounds like an interesting read. Might check it out, just for the glimpse of what life was like back then (from one man's perspective, that is) if nothing else.
ReplyDeleteIt can be shocking when we read something written in ohh so recent past that has attitudes nearer the 18th century than the 21st. And in one way it's a good thing for it can show just how far we've traveled, while also showing how far yet to travel. In this, it isn't even a question of left and right, but one of citizenship, and those that control the system protecting those that gain most while protecting themselves all the while cloaking themselves in the mantel of democracy.
ReplyDeleteI find old books like this interesting precisely because they are a representation of the times. I like knowing how people used to think and what they did and enjoyed.
ReplyDeleteThat does sound like an interesting book.
ReplyDeleteHard for a non American to comment here. Well, not and not have people reaching for a Winchester anyway.
ReplyDeleteSounds like this is written from a unique perspective. I can understand why you'd have mixed feelings while reading it. I think I would too. Thanks for the review!
ReplyDeleteI'll stay away from this one, but I truly appreciate the review.
ReplyDeleteHi Sage - thanks for highlighting this book - it does sound a fascinating read ... and a real read at that too. Telling it like it is - yet from his perspective, which we can understand more now. I'm going to put it on my Wish List ... and at some stage I'll get to order it and read it! ... cheers Hilary
ReplyDeleteSince everyone else has already commented on the story being a product of its time, etc, I would like to comment about how people kept leaving their children around for wild animals to run off with them. I knew the mortality rate in children was much higher in centuries past, but I had no idea it was due to attacks by roving monkeys and birds of prey.
ReplyDeleteI sometimes struggle with older books, especially nonfiction. Some of the attitudes that were common in the past make me cringe now. It sounds like an interesting book. I’m glad you liked it.
ReplyDeleteAj @ Read All The Things!
When we read something from this time, we have to remember what it was like. I personally wouldn't read it. What I read are stories from the other side. Like... To Be a Slave by Julius Lester.
ReplyDeleteMay not be my first choice of go to book ... but I enjoyed your review.
ReplyDeleteAll the best Jan
You always provide excellent and detailed reviews of books you share, Sage. I think we always have to consider the context of the time in which something was written, although paternalism always makes my skin crawl.
ReplyDelete