Monday, June 10, 2013

A Crack at the Edge of the World

Simon Winchester, A Crack at the Edge of the World: America and the Great California Earthquake of 1906 (New York: HarperCollins, 2005), 461 pages with illustrations, suggestions for additional readings and an index.

On April 18, 1906, San Francisco was awakened by a massive earthquake.   The shaking of the earth and the fires that followed destroyed much of the city.  Yet, it wasn’t the first nor was it the largest of the earth’s recent tremors.  In the months leading up to the San Francisco quake, there were jitters all along earth’s fault lines as well as a seemingly unusual amount of volcanic activity.  As a trained geologist, Simon Winchester provides a detailed explanation of plate tectonics (he also provides similar explanations in at least two other books, Krakatoa and Atlantic).  In addition to speaking of the movement of plates, he discusses the geology behind earthquakes (not all quakes occur along plates) as well exploring the developing science of earthquakes.  Although we’ve come a long ways since 1906 (plate tectonics is a relatively new theory), by the time of the San Francisco quake, the earth was ringing with instruments allowing scientist at the time to gain a better understanding of what was happening to the earth’s crust.  These records are also benefits for modern geologists who can use them with newer insight.  Thanks to these new insights, the pinpoint of the earthquakes epicenter has changed.   

Winchester ties his book together with a road trip around much of the North American plate (he drives across country for a teaching gig in San Francisco, after which he heads north to Alaska before heading  east).  This allows him to explore other large quakes within the North American plate such as Charleston, South Carolina (1886), New Madrid, Missouri (1811) and Anchorage, AK (1964).   In a way, these travels often seemed to distract from the point of the book, though they did provide a personal link to his stories. 
In addition to geology, Winchester provides a history of San Francisco as well as parts of the city such as Chinatown.  The quake destroyed immigration records of the Chinese which gave those seeking to flee the wars going on in China a way to get around the tough immigration laws of the day. 

Some of the interesting facts of the earthquake include how the insurance companies argued in court over whether the destruction was from the quake or the fire.  After the fire, it was hard in parts of San Francisco to tell which buildings were damaged by the quake (and not covered by insurance) or fire (and covered by insurance).   He also talked about the architecture of San Francisco and how some wanted the city to develop a master plan for development after the quake, but business interest quickly took over and the designs by Daniel Hudson Burnham for a city like Washington were quickly shelved.  Although San Francisco is often seen as an “artsy city,” Winchester notes that this wasn’t until after World War II. 

Winchester also discusses potential religious fallout from the quake.  To the south, in Los Angeles, the Azusa Street revivals were just beginning to gather steam.  These revivals are important in the development of Pentecostalism in America and the preachers quickly pointed to the quake as evidence of God’s judgment.  In Krakatoa, Winchester points to a similar fundamentalist religious rise in radical Islam in Indonesia following that volcano’s massive eruption.   Labeling the disaster as God’s judgment isn’t anything new.  In my own studies of Virginia City, Nevada (which in a way was a sister city to San Francisco), there were general outcry by those affected by a disastrous fire in 1875, which burned much of the city’s business district, at the preachers in San Francisco who pointed to the destruction as God’s judgment.  By 1906, Virginia City was just a shell of itself and no one was paying much attention to what its preachers were saying, but I'll have to go back into my notes and see if there was any mention of the San Francisco fire and earthquake. . Of course, not everyone was ready to point the finger at their neighbor’s misfortune and, as was the case in Virginia City which also received help from San Francisco following the fire, those in Los Angeles responded immediately by sending supplies.   


This is the fourth book I’ve read by Simon Winchester and I have come to appreciate how he weaves together two of my favorite subjects, history and geology.  I recommend this book even though I didn’t think it measures up to Krakatoa (my favorite of the four books I’ve read by Winchester).  However, this book does provide the reader with an understanding of what goes on under our feet, as well as insight into San Francisco’s history, especially the great earthquake.  

26 comments:

  1. By the standards of today's earthquakes the SF quake of '06 seems almost quaint at 6-7 magnitude. What was the AK '64 trembler 9 or something close?

    I am not necessarily anti religion but I do get a bit yanked when the religious attribute a natural occurrence of physics and motion as retribution from the hand of God.

    Now I am listening to the amount of relatively minor quakes were seeing near fracking sights and trying to figure if there is a connection.

    Sounds like a pretty good read though I would be more focused on the original western Sin City. With it's shanghai bars and roaming self appointed police posse'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The connection of quakes from one side of the world to another is something that he suggests may be linked, but he doesn't go into fracking.

      Delete
  2. I guess insurance companies always have and always will fight over causes

    ~pia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, some did pay off right away while others resisted (and others went broke). The fires were as destructive as the quakes.

      Delete
  3. Actually that quake was what made Lloyds of London in the USA. They paid without much quibble.

    Remember in the 80s when AIDS was being touted as a punishment from God too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He does praise Lloyd s for paying off their claims. I think we humans like to have something to blame for our problems.

      Delete
  4. Sounds like a fascinating read. I too, like how he connects several subjects with the topic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He weaves together several topics better than most authors!

      Delete
  5. Sounds like a fascinating theme for the book. I like that kind of approach.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I always admire those who can successfully put together such themes.

      Delete
  6. i read krakatoa...good book....but dont think i have ever read anything else by him....def sounds like it would be a really cool read...and i am in sore need of something new to read so....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brian, I'd recommend his biography of the Atlantic Ocean over this--that I felt was a master piece.

      Delete
  7. I have seen so many photos from that great earthquake and posted a few from time to time for Sepia Saturday. I should check his book out. He is a very interesting and witty writer indeed! I just recently discovered his book "The Meaning of Everything" and found it actually from this awesome video of him discussing it. Not sure if you've read this one, but I'm a huge fan of words so it's made for me!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3SmOsbLays

    ReplyDelete
  8. Interesting how the insurance companies tried to finagle out of what they're paid for even back that. Almost a hundred years later trying to collect on the policies down here for the '94 Northridge quake was a joke. Now, it's so difficult to even get eq insurance.
    I've not read anything by Winchester. I'll have to look into this and some of his other books.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, and earthquake insurance in Utah became outrageous afterwards, too!

      Delete
  9. Ah, Sage, this is right up my alley, and I've written it down. I love these kinds of books. Thank you!

    Pearl

    ReplyDelete
  10. So interesting! I once had lunch at the Faultline Restaurant in San Juan Bautista, CA. I kept imagining being sucked down into a crack in the earth if there was an earthquake during lunch. :)

    ReplyDelete
  11. I always learn something fascinating and new here, Sage. That San Francisco's reputation as an artists haven after WWII was something I never knew.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This was knew to me, also. He actually suggests that the theaters that were so popular during the Gold Rush never recovered (until later) and that it was the Beat Generation that gave rise to the new view of SF as an artist hub. He noted that pre-WW2, authors like Steinbeck hung out at places south of the city like Monterrey. This is my thoughts, but even earlier writers like Twain and Haute, who spent time in SF, were known for the stories they wrote in the Sierra foothills, not in the city.

      Delete
  12. It sounds like a book I'd really enjoy. I'll probably check it out. I see that the insurance companies haven't changed much...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With your running around the desert, you might find his travels interesting and they may give you a few new destinations as he does spent a lot of time following the "faults" of your state! (that's corny, I know).

      Delete
  13. The name sounded familiar so I checked and I have another volcano book of his on Krakatoa. It was really good and I enjoyed reading it so this one is definitely on my Christmas list.

    ReplyDelete